NOW AVAILABLE IN SPANISH

The Twenty Fourth Day of the 
Tenth Month in The Year of JahShua, 
One Thousand Nine Hundred Ninety Seven

The Right Honourable Tzemach "Ben" David Netzer Korem 
Head of DOM House of Elders 
Dominion of Melchizedek 
9 Nablus Street, East Jerusalem, Middle East

Letter of Opinion Concerning Legal and Lawful Existence Of the Dominion of Melchizedek

This letter opinion (hereinafter the "Letter of Opinion") has been internally prepared at the request of the Dominion of Melchizedek House of Elders. This Letter of Opinion respectfully delivered by former Ambassador Geoffrey Craig benRichard barAbba, JD, who served in the Dominion of Melchizedek as Honorary Counsel and Governor of the Dominion of Melchizedek Bar Association. Geoffrey no longer holds any titles in DOM, and this letter should no longer be considered his exclusive work, since it will be updated, with deletions and additions from time to time.  In preparing this opinion numerous sources were consulted. Furthermore, the extensive Dominion of Melchizedek legislation and background information found on the Internet at www.melchizedek.com was consulted in the preparation of this Letter of Opinion. Notice should be taken by each reader that this Letter of Opinion will be supplemented from time-to-time as needed to amplify points and issues as deemed necessary.

This Letter of Opinion is intended to be read in its entirety, and not quoted or used in excerpts, where portions might be misconstrued or taken out of context. At all times the Doctrine of Continuity is intended to be applied to this Letter of Opinion without exception.

*** C A V E A T *** WARNING…. ***

It is anticipated that readers of this opinion will vary considerably in legal expertise, running the gamut from lawyers and statesman to professionals and others having little or no legal training. Consequently, each and every reader of this Letter of Opinion is hereby expressly advised to retain independent counsel concerning each and every matter and issue of personal interest. No decision on the part of any reader should be made of and concerning any relationship with the Dominion of Melchizedek [whether prospective or actual], without first retaining and carefully consulting independent counsel of your own choice.

Introduction

This Letter of Opinion is essentially divided into two parts. In Part One attention has been paid to the spiritual and physical existence of the Dominion of Melchizedek as an ecclesiastical sovereignty in the form of a dominion. Although certain legal terms are used in Part One for purposes of perspective, legal discussion of significant issues and questions has been reserved for Part Two of this Letter of Opinion. Finally, in Part Three information for contacting the author of this Letter of Opinion is given with the hope that meaningful dialogue may be encouraged and fostered for peaceful settlement of any professional or other differences of opinion.

Part One

Spiritual and Physical Existence of the Dominion of Melchizedek

The first task to be undertaken in Part One is the establishment of the approximate time when the Dominion of Melchizedek first appears in our common history. Most readers are reasonably aware of Melchizedek who appears in the Bible twice in the Old Testament and once in the New Testament. In the book of Genesis at Chapter 14 in the Old Testament Melchizedek appears to Abram as both the King of Salem and a priest of the Most High God. Thus without prior reference before this 14^th Chapter in Genesis, Melchizedek appears without genealogy but with an unchallenged kingdom in the city of Salem and a full priesthood without any record of earthly ordination. The term Salem signifies the term "peace" transliterated from "Shalem" in Hebrew Strong's Concordance #8004 which states concerning the use of Salem with Melchizedek as follows: "Salem = 'peace' 1) the place of which Melchizedek was king, 1a most Jewish commentators affirm that it is the same as Jerusalem."

Discussion of Old Testament References to Everlasting Dominion, Kingdom and Priesthood.

From the scriptures quoted below, the "dominion" and "kingdom" of the Most High God, over which Melchizedek is priest is repeatedly referred to as a kingdom and dominion which lasts forever, and extends geographically from sea to sea [e.g. without physical boundary].

Genesis 14

Melchizedek next appears in Psalms at:

Psalm 110

A simple word search in Logos Bible Software published by Logos Bible Systems, Inc. reveals the term "dominion" appearing in the Old Testament [King James version] approximately 44 times. The Hebrew Strong's Concordance usage most utilized in these 44 passages is Strong's #7287 representing the Hebrew transliterated word "radah" signifying "1) to rule, have dominion, dominate, tread down . . .". This #7287 is the "dominion" used in the first Psalm set out below. The second of the two Psalms quoted below has a Strong's Concordance # 4475 symbolizing the transliterated Hebrew word "memshalah signifying: "1) rule, dominion, realm, 1a) rule, dominion, realm, domain, 1b) rule, 1c) rule, dominion (of God). Finally, in the passages quoted below from Daniel represent Hebrew Strong's Concordance # 7985 transliterated to the English term "dominion" from the Aramaic word "sholtan" signifying: "1) dominion, sovereignty, 1a) dominion, sovereignty, 1b) realm".

". . .Sovereignty; as the dominion of the seas or over a territory. . ."

The term "dominion" is signified in more general parlance as: "1 To rule or power to rule; sovereign authority; sovereignty 2 a governed territory of country…" [Webster's New World Dictionary, Third College Ed. 1994]

In Genesis 14 verse 18, Melchizedek is also referred to as a king. This term "king" is transliterated to English from the Hebrew word "melek" or "malak" found at Hebrew Strong's concordance #'s 4428 and 4427 signifying in pertinent part: "1) to be or become king or queen, reign . . .".

Discussion of New Testament References to Everlasting Dominion, Kingdom and Priesthood.

In the book of Hebrews written by Paul, Melchizedek ("Melchizedec") again appears in Chapters 5, 6 and 7. Consistent with Old Testament references, Melchizedek in the New Testament is again referred to as the King of Peace with an everlasting dominion and kingdom. He has no "beginning of days or end of days" which serve to delineate any temporal boundaries to Melchizedek's dominion, kingdom and priesthood all of which are compassed by his service of the Most High God.

Hebrews 5

In The Dead Sea Scriptures by Theodore Gastner [Doubleday, New York (1976], the author exhaustively examines certain of the writings uncovered during the Dead Sea digs. One such writing is referred to by scholars as The Last Jubilee: A Sermon [referred to by scholars as "Melchizedek Texts"]. In the commentary which precedes a copy of the text Gastner writes:

1…I take my text from the law of jubilee. In this year of the jubilee, we read, you shall return, every one of you, to his patrimony. (Lev. 25.13)

2-3…THIS IS A PIECE WITH the commandment concerning the Period of Remission. WHAT IS MEANT BY THE PERIOD OF REMISSION, SAYS THE SCRIPTURE, IS THAT ANYONE WHO HAS MADE A LOAN TO HIS NEIGHBOR IS THEN NOT TO EXACT PAYMENT OF IT FROM THAT NEIGHBOR OR KINSMAN, SEEING THAT A PERIOD OF

4…REMISSION HAS BEEN DECLARED BY God

(Deut. 15.2)

AS APPLIED TO THE LAST DAYS, THIS REFERS TO THE Liberation of those IN CAPTIVITY, CONSONANT WITH THE WORDS of Isaiah: (The Lord has sent me) to proclaim liberation to the captives (Isa. 61.1). Since the (Hebrew) word for 'liberation' is homonymous with one meaning 'swallow' - which is, of course, a

5… celestial creature - THIS SIGNIFIES THAT THEY WILL BECOME ONE WITH THE SONS OF HEAVEN.

The same may be expressed ALSO by saying that [THEY WILL PARTAKE] [OF THE INHERIT]ANCE OF [MELCHIZ]EDEK. Melchizedek, you will recall, was 'a priest of God Most High' who pronounced the blessing of that God over our father Abraham (Gen. 14.18-20). Now, the 'inheritance' of a priest is, as we learn from the Scriptures, the Lord God Himself, and since the God of Melchizedek is expressly described as 'owner of heaven and earth', the meaning is that Abraham will thenceforth have a stake in the things both of heaven on high and of the earth below. Moreover, since the priesthood in Israel and that of Melchizedek himself are said in Scripture to be eternal (cf. Num. 25.13, Ps. 110.4), it is not only to Abraham but also to his offspring that this privilege is vouchsafed; they will be linked to God in an everlasting covenant (cf. Gen. 17.7, 19, etc.) and the Lord Himself will be their inheritance and patrimony (cf. Ezek. 44.28).

6…At the final jubilee, therefore, GOD WILL IN FACT BE RESTORING THEM TO what is rightfully theirs; they will indeed 'return, every one, to his patrimony'.

AS FOR THE ALLUSION in the law of jubilee (Lev. 25.10) to proclaiming liberation to them, THIS IS TO BE UNDERSTOOD ALSO IN THE SENSE THAT HE WILL THEN REMIT [THE FULL TERM OF] THE PUNISHMENT FOR THEIR MISDEEDS, for the (Hebrew) word rendered 'liberation' is also a technical term for remission of debts.

7…ALL THIS WILL HAPPEN IN THE FINAL 'WEEK' OF A SERIES OF YEARS INVOLVING NINE PRECEDING JUBILEES. WHEN, THEREFORE, THE SCRIPTURE SPEAKS OF A DAY OF ATONEMENT to be observed in the seventh month (Lev. 25.9), WHAT IS MEANT, in an eschatological sense, IS THAT this final jubilee will be marked BY A DAY ON WHICH ALL THE CHILDREN OF LIGHT AND ALL WHO HAVE CAST THEIR LOT WITH (THE CAUSE OF) RIGHTEOUSNESS WILL ACHIEVE FORGIVENESS OF THEIR SINS, [WHEREAS THE WICKED WILL REAP THEIR DESERTS AND BE BROUGHT TO AN E]ND.

1. THIS IS THE ERA which Isaiah terms the Year of Favor

11…place, IT SAYS: (Though a very congregation of (heathen) peoples now surround you), rise above it, O Israel, and return to your eminence, for God will judge the peoples (Ps. 7.8-9). The return in question is, of course, that which is prefigured in the rule of jubilee that everyone is then to return to his patrimony (Lev. 25.13).

Moreover, it should be observed that the (Hebrew) word for favor can also be understood, by a different derivation, to mean the expiration of a term of punishment, so that this too is implied in the prophet's expression.

THERE IS A FURTHER REFERENCE TO THIS FINAL JUDGMENT IN THE CONTINUATION OF THE VERSE FROM PSALTER. How long, we read, will you go on judging unjustly and showing partiality to the wicked? Selah.

12…(Ps. 7.9) THE ALLUSION IS TO BELIAL AND THE SPIRITS OF HIS ILK - THAT IS, TO (elders who sit in assizes but) DEFY GOD'S STATUTES IN ORDER TO 13…PER[VERT JUSTICE]. The future King of Righteousness - that is, MELCHIZEDEK redivivus - WILL EXECUTE [UPON THEM] GOD'S AVENGING 14…JUDGMENTS, AND at the same time DELIVER [THE JUST] FROM THE HANDS OF BELIAL AND ALL (THOSE) SPIRITS OF HIS ILK. WITH ALL 'THE ANGELS [OF RIGHTEOUSNESS] AT HIS AID, HE WILL [BLA]ST [THE COUNCIL OF] BELIAL [TO DESTRUCTION]. But the faithful, as the Psalmist says, will return to (their) eminence (ibid.), THE EMINENCE IN QUESTION BEING THE [DESTINATION] OF ALL WHO ARE INDEED CHILDREN OF GOD.

15…THE VISI[TATION] OF WHICH I HAVE BEEN SPEAKING IS THE SAME AS THE DAY OF [RETRIBUTION] OF WHICH THE PROPHET [ISA]IAH SPEAKS IN WORDS:

16…How fair upon the mountains are the feet of the herald who proclaims 'Shalom! (peace)', the herald of good tidings who proclaims 'Salvation!' who says to Zion, 'Your God has now claimed His kingdom!' (Isa. 52.7), for the word shalom may also be read shillum, 'retribution', as who should say, 'All is hell!' rather than 'All is well!'

17…THE MOUNTAINS in that passage STAND FOR THE PROPHETS, [AND THE FEET FOR THEIR WORDS, WHEREBY] THEY BR[ING THEIR MESSAGE] TO ALL [WHO ARE WILLING TO LISTEN]; WHILE THE HERALD IS he who is elsewhere described AS THE ONE ANOINTED

18…WITH THE SPIRIT (Isa. 61.1) - THE SAME WHOM DAN[IEL] CALLS THE [ANOINTED LEADER WHO WILL MAKE HIS APPEARANCE AT THE END OF 19…SEVEN WEEKS (OF YEARS) --THAT IS, AT THE FINAL JUBILEE.] Similarly, THE HERALD OF GOOD TIDINGS, THE SAME WHO PROCLAIMS ['SHALOM'] IS HE OF WHOM IT IS WRITTEN: [(the Lord has sent me) to comfort all who mourn,

20-22… etc.] (Isa. 61.3), for the word shalom suggests also the expression shallem nihumim, which is of comforting mourners (Isa. 57.18). THE COMFORT IN QUESTION WILL CONSIST IN GIVING THEM A TRUE OVER-VIEW OF THE SUCCESSIVE ERAS OF HISTORY (LIT. THE WORLD), IN THEIR RESPECTIVE TIMES.

22…At that time, IT WILL BE FROM BELIAL, not from God, THAT MEN WILL TURN AWAY IN REBELLION, AND THERE WILL [BE A RE-ESTABLISHMENT OF THE REIGN OF RIGHTEOUSNESS, PERVERSITY 23…BEING CONFOUNDED] BY THE JUDGMENTS OF GOD. THIS IS WHAT SCRIPTURE IMPLIES IN THE WORDS, Who says to Zion, Your God has now claimed His kingdom! (Isa. 52.7), THE TERM DENOTING THE 24…TOTAL CONGREGATION OF THE 'SONS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS' - THAT IS, THOSE WHO MAINTAIN THE COVENANT AND TURN AWAY FROM THE POPULAR TREND, AND YOUR GOD

25…SIGNIFYING [THE KING OF RIGHTEOUSNESS, ALIAS MELCHIZEDEK REDIVIVUS, WHO WILL DEST]ROY? BELIAL

OUR TEXT SPEAKS ALSO OF SOUNDING A LOUD TRUMPET BLAST THROUGHOUT THE LAND ON THE TENTH DAY OF THE SEVENTH MONTH (Lev. 25.9). [As APPLIED TO THE LAST DAYS, THIS REFERS TO THE FANFARE WHICH WILL THEN BE SOUNDED BEFORE THE MESSIANIC KING].

(The rest is lost)

Certain Conclusions Drawn From Old And New Testament References to Melchizedek's Dominion, Kingdom and Priesthood.

It is quite evident from the foregoing the writers of Old Testament, New Testament and Dead Sea Scroll writings all agree Melchizedek's "Dominion", "Kingdom" and Priesthood" are eternal, from generation to generation and from sea to sea. These consistencies reveal there are no geographic or temporal boundaries to the dominion, kingdom and priesthood. In fact, in the last days of prophesied, Melchizedek plays a leading role in restoring the people to their patrimony, following a remission of all debt and other encumbrances in their lives. This understanding is consistent with the Alexandrian philosopher who characterized members in Melchizedek priesthood following the teaching of the Most High God as follows:

Pilgrimage. ... In Scripture the journey of a human life. Gen. xvii".

American Dictionary of the English Language (1828) Vol. II p. 35.

Pilgrimage - One's spiritual journey through life that looks beyond death for a larger fulfillment than that which their own lifetime and earthly experience could afford. One's realization that this life is not an end in itself but a pilgrimage towards a better goal beyond it.

Further Biblical References:

Nelson's New Illustrated Bible Dictionary says the following about Melchizedek:

In Psalm 110, a messianic psalm written by David (Matt. 22:43), Melchizedek is seen as a type of Christ. This theme is repeated in the Book of Hebrews, where both Melchizedek and Christ are considered kings of righteousness and peace. By citing Melchizedek and his unique priesthood as a type, the writer shows that Christ's new priesthood is superior to the old Levitical order and the priesthood of Aaron (Heb. 7:1-10; Melchisedec, KJV).

Melchizedek was a real, historical king-priest who served as a type for the greater King-Priest who was to come, Jesus Christ (p. 819).

The Eerdmans Bible Dictionary gives this interpretation of the seventh chapter of Hebrews:

Within the interpretation of Ps. 110 that occupies much of the epistle to the Hebrews, Heb. 7 builds on Gen. 14:18-20. Abraham's acknowledgment of the legitimacy of Melchizedek's priesthood becomes an argument for the priority of that priesthood over the "descendants of Levi" (vv. 4-10). The messianic ruler of Ps. 110 is, therefore, a priest of a line prior to the levitical priesthood ("after the order of Melchizedek"; Heb. 7:11-19; KJV "Melchisedec"; cf. 5:6, 10; 6:20). That the narrative of the king-priest Melchizedek is introduced so abruptly into Genesis becomes an argument for Melchizedek's being "without father or mother or genealogy," i.e., beginning or end (7:3), and so not only a predecessor but also a type of Christ as "a priest for ever" (cf. Ps. 110:4). The legitimacy of the levitical priesthood depends on its descent from Levi; as it has a beginning, so it has an end in the understanding of the author of Hebrews (p. 707).

The caves where the Dead Sea Scrolls were found yielded a series of thirteen fragments on Melchizedek. From these, it appears the belief that Melchizedek was the Messiah was a strongly held conviction among the Qumran community, as well as among some other Jewish and Gnostic sects in the first century A.D.

Some branches of the Church of God have also held this view. They have used the depiction of Melchizedek in Hebrews 7 not only to connect him to Christ but also as support for the co-eternality of Christ with God the Father in the Binitarian model of the Godhead.

In Hebrews 6:20 we find the premise of chapter 7 established, which is that Jesus Christ is now our High Priest in heaven. As such, he is of the order of Melchizedek, which is contrasted with the Levitical priesthood.

Harper's Bible Commentary says of this passage:

Formally, the chapter [Hebrews 7] constitutes an exegetical discussion of Ps. 110:4 based upon the only other OT text that mentions Melchizedek, Gen. 14:17-20. This exegesis, emphasizing the heavenly character of Christ's priesthood, may have been inspired by the abundant contemporary speculation on Melchizedek as a heavenly figure, examples of which are found in the Alexandrian Jewish writer Philo, at Qumran, and in Gnostic sources. Whatever the inspiration, Hebrews is quite restrained in its comments on Melchizedek, utilizing only what is necessary to make the Christological point (p. 1265).

Harper's goes on to say that " from the pregnant silence of Scripture is deduced Melchizedek's status as 'fatherless, motherless, without genealogy' (v. 3)" (p. 1265). Thus, Melchizedek could be said to be "without father, without mother, and without genealogy" because the Scriptures didn't identify his lineage. While this argument might seem unconvincing to the modern mind, it would have been understandable and reasonable to a first century Jew.

The Abingdon Bible Commentary says that in Hebrews 7:3, the author "makes a very remarkable use of the argument from silence. Nothing is said in Genesis about the parentage of Melchizedek. We are not told anything about his father or his mother. There is no reference to the beginning of his life or to its end - to his birth or to his death. . .. In view of the writer the silences of Scripture are as significant as its statements. . .." (p. 1310).

About Hebrews 7:3, Halley's Bible Handbook says:

Now let's look at some of the Greek words used in this verse to corroborate the above explanations. The first is agenealogetos. Vine's Complete Expository Dictionary of Old and New Testament Words says this word " denotes 'without recorded pedigree'. . . . " Vine's goes on to say that " the narrative in Gen. 14 is so framed in facts and omissions as to foreshadow the person of Christ" (NT, p. 262).

The abridged Theological Dictionary of the New Testament (TDNT) says agenealogetos" occurs only in Heb. 7:3, where Melchizedek is said to be 'without genealogy.' Unlike the Aaronic priests, he has no traceable descent" (p. 114).

Word Meanings in the New Testament states that this word "is compounded of alpha-negative and the verb genealogeo; (found in NT only in v. 6), 'to trace ancestry.' So it clearly means 'without genealogy' (NASB, NIV) that is, without a recorded pedigree. We should not assume, as some have wrongly done, that Melchizedek was without human ancestry" (p. 424).

In their book "The Life and Epistles of St. Paul", Conybeare and Howson write that this word means " without table of descent." They go on to explain, "The priesthood of Melchisedec was not, like the Levitical priesthood, dependent on his descent, through his parents, from a particular family, but was a personal office" (p. 800).

Next let's look at the word aphomoiomenos. TDNT says that "this verb [the root aphomoioo;] means 'to copy,' rarely 'to compare,' and in the passive 'to be or become like' or 'make oneself out to be like'" (p. 686).

ISBE states: "Some have thought that Melchizedek was a Christophany rather than a historical character and thus understood vv. 2b-3 literally rather than typologically. A major objection to such an interpretation is the statement that Melchizedek resembled (Gk. aphomoiomenos) the Son of God (v. 3). The verb aphomoioo [from which aphomoiomenos is derived] always assumes two distinct and separate identities, one which is a copy of the other. Thus Melchizedek and the Son of God are represented as two separate persons, the first of which resembled the second" ("Melchizedek," vol. 3, p. 313).

So, as you can see, the underlying Greek in verse 3 supports the assertion that Melchizedek was not Christ before his incarnation. The meaning of the Greek verb utilized to describe the comparison made between them demonstrates that they cannot be the same being. To claim that they are contradicts the specific meaning of aphomoiomenos.

HEBREWS 7:4 Now consider how great this man was, to whom even the patriarch Abraham gave a tenth of the spoils. 5 And indeed those who are of the sons of Levi, who receive the priesthood, have a commandment to receive tithes from the people according to the law, that is, from their brethren, though they have come from the loins of Abraham; 6 but he whose genealogy is not derived [genealogoumenos] from them received tithes from Abraham and blessed him who had the promises. 7 Now beyond all contradiction the lesser is blessed by the better. 8 Here mortal men receive tithes, but there he receives them, of whom it is witnessed that he lives. 9 Even Levi, who receives tithes, paid tithes through Abraham, so to speak, 10 for he was still in the loins of his father when Melchizedek met him. (NKJV)

In these verses the author seeks to demonstrate the superiority of Melchizedek (and by implication Christ) to the Levitical priesthood. His assertion is based on the fact that God designated that the Levites would receive all the tithes of the people under the old covenant. However, because Melchizedek received tithes from Abraham, the progenitor of the Levites, his priesthood is declared to be greater than theirs.

The use of genealogoumenos in verse 6 shows that Melchizedek has lineage, but it is not through Levi. Let's examine the Greek word genealogoumenos in verse 6 closely. Vine's says of this word: "'to reckon or trace a genealogy' (from genea, 'a race,' and lego, 'to choose, pick out'), is used, in the passive voice, of Melchizedek in Heb. 7:6, RV, 'whose genealogy (KJV, 'descent') is not counted" (NT, p. 262).

TDNT says "this derives from genealogos, 'one who draws up a genealogy.' It occurs. . ., in the NT only in Heb. 7:6: Melchizedek does not 'derive his descent' from the descendants of Levi" (p. 114).

The Exegetical Dictionary of the New Testament (EDNT) says this word means to "trace one's descent. In Heb. 7:6 of Melchizedek, who 'does not trace his descent' (NEB) to the sons of Levi" (vol. 1, p. 242).

Verse 8 also causes some to relate this chapter to Christ. It says that the tithes were received by mortal Levites, but when Melchizedek received them they were obtained by one who lives. The author's use of the phrase "it is witnessed that he lives" here clearly shows that he is employing the argument from silence as the basis for his claims. Genesis 14:18-20 does not state that Melchizedek remains alive to the writer's time; therefore, the witness is one derived from silence. Hebrews 7:11 and 15 (shown below) both specifically say that Christ arose as another priest.

HEBREWS 7:11 Therefore, if perfection were through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people received the law), what further need was there that another [heteros] priest should rise according to the order of Melchizedek, and not be called according to the order of Aaron? 12 For the priesthood being changed, of necessity there is also a change of the law. 13 For He of whom these things are spoken belongs to another tribe, from which no man has officiated at the altar. 14 For it is evident that our Lord arose from Judah, of which tribe Moses spoke nothing concerning priesthood. 15 And it is yet far more evident if, in the likeness of Melchizedek, there arises another [heteros] priest 16 who has come, not according to the law of a fleshly commandment, but according to the power of an endless life.(NKJV)

Verses 11 and 15 clearly state that Christ is another , different priest of the order originated by Melchizedek. There is no suggestion here that Melchizedek and Christ are the same entity. If they were, the writer of Hebrews surely would have stressed that point. But the use of heteros plainly indicates that Christ, although he came in the likeness of Melchizedek, was not Melchizedek.

Let's analyze the word heteros, found in verses 11 and 15. TDNT says: "In the NT heteros is used in much the same way as allos . . ., It denotes the new member in a series that either continues (Lk. 14:18ff.) or concludes it (Acts 15:35). It may denote others either of the same kind (Acts 17:34; Lk. 4:34) or of another kind (Lk. 23:32) . . .;." (p. 265).

Vine's says that allos and heteros " have a different meaning, which despite a tendency to be lost, is to be observed in numerous passages. Allos expresses a numerical difference and denotes 'another of the same sort'; heteros expresses a qualitative difference and denotes 'another of a different sort'" (NT, p.29).

EDNT says of this word that "approximately half of the occurrences have the connotation of something additional: a further or additional instances of a type. . . Passages that speak of another as a replacement or successor also have an adversative association (Acts 1:20; 7:18; Rom 7:4; Heb 7:11, 13, 15)" (vol. 2, p. 66).

In the rest of chapter 7, the author makes his primary point: the Levitical priesthood has been superseded by our eternal High Priest, the risen Jesus Christ. Even though he traced his lineage through the tribe of Judah, he was the King-Priest God had promised in Psalm 110. For Christians, he instituted a new covenant, one based on spiritual promises instead of physical ones. The reason for the argument from silence begun in verse 3 is to substantiate the author's assertion in this passage.

CONCLUSION FOR THIS PORTION ONLY

It's plain from the original Greek text, from an understanding of rabbinical forms of argument, and from what the Bible reveals elsewhere, that Melchizedek was not Christ before his human birth. Melchizedek was a historical figure, the priest of Almighty God who lived in the days of Abraham. Very little is known about him other than the fact he was the priest-king of Salem (Jerusalem). Obviously he was named to the office of priest by God and not by the requirements of the law. Therefore, he is a fitting type of the spiritual priesthood of Christ.

Dominion of Melchizedek internal materials reviewed for purposes of this Legal Opinion are provided verbatim below and repeated here for purposes of continuity and consistency.

The following references in this Section are reprinted in large part verbatim from materials which appear at the Dominion of Melchizedek's website at www.melchizedek.com.

INTRODUCTION TO THE MELCHIZEDEK BIBLE

INTRODUCTION 

On the verge of a new millennium, we present the Melchizedek Bible.

The Dominion of Melchizedek, an ecclesiastical sovereignty defined in Holy Writ as a heavenly sent one world government, has adopted this work to be a useful tool in our mission of ushering in the coming millennium of peace and righteousness.

When first publishing the Melchizedek Bible in 1986, we found that readers of this work were curious as to its source, therefore in subsequent editions we include a piece about the authors following this Introduction.

ON THE REAPPEARING OF THE MESSIAH

We believe that the New Testament teaches that Jesus' successor will fulfill the prophecies about the coming messianic priest-king. With the Lubavitchers to our right, and the "Jews for Jesus" to our left, we are in the center of this issue.

The New Testament teaches that Jesus was the prophet like unto Moses. Before Old Testament JahShua entered the promised land, Moses passed his authority and rulership over to JahShua, so that Israel would not be like sheep without a shepherd. And so the Spirit of Jesus (pronounced "JahShua" in Hebrew) taught in Revelation that the Overcomer continuing in Jesus' works would enter the new millennium with messianic rulership over the nations, sitting on the throne of David, bearing his new name.

The Great Shepherd? When blessing his sons, Israel pointed out that from Judah there would come a Shiloh to whom the people shall gather; but from Joseph would come the great shepherd. Moses' lineage did not trace to Judah, nor did Jesus' lineage trace to Joseph; and because Zechariah pointed to two anointed sons, i.e., messiahs, we believe that the Overcomer is from the line of Joseph, a branch of the "vine" that migrated to England, then "grew over the wall" to America. He is also Isaiah's branch that grew out of Jesse's roots, of the line of Old Testament King David. Keep in mind that both Revelation and Paul taught that Jesus was a root not a branch.

Jesus referred to himself as a vine, but his disciples he called branches. With this in mind, it seems clear that Jesus thought not of himself as the priest-king branch that Zechariah taught would build the temple of the Lord, but rather this niche in life was reserved for the Overcomer continuing in messianic works.

Jesus taught that although John the Baptist was not Elijah, that he did fulfill the prophecy that Elijah would return. Think about this, if John could fulfill the prophecy that Elijah would return, why not the Overcomer fulfill the prophecy that Jesus will come again, remembering that Elijah worked many miracles, and departed into heaven alive. Jesus taught that Elijah would return again the third time. Perhaps the greatly revered Lubavitcher Rebbe represented Elijah as prophesied by Malachi.

ON THE BUILDING OF THE TEMPLE

We believe that the time has come for the building of the Lord's house as foretold by Isaiah, yet we will not establish it near the Islamic Dome of the Rock, but on a higher location. The Holy House will no longer be a place to sacrifice goats and sheep, but instead, the home of the Overcomer, and 24 elders, from where the nations may be guided.

We invite you to join us in the building of the Lord's house.

ON RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS

Although we do conduct Melchizedekian Bible studies we have not attempted to form any "religion", but rather invite all religious groups to unite with us. All monotheistic religions stem from the blessing Abraham received from the priest-king of Salem, Melchizedek.

ON POLYTHEISTIC RELIGIONS

We have noticed that as these religions evolve, they have a tendency to discard their polytheistic beliefs. Contrariwise, some monotheistic religions have devolved into polytheistic and pantheistic teachings, inclusive of idolatry.

ON JEWISH RELIGIONS

We adore the sincerity of various Jewish spiritual organizations, while adhering strictly to monotheism, and keeping alive the Jewish traditions.   It can be argued that all monotheistic religions are Jewish.  Why?  Because Jesus was Jew, therefore the religion he is claimed to have started, Christianity, is therefore Jewish, and he said that "salvation is of the Jews" and because Muslims accept that Jesus is the Messiah of God, born of a Virgin, therefore their Messiah too.  Keep in mind that one can be Jewish by race (from the tribe of Judah) and/or by religion.  We recommend that all monotheists accept their Jewishness and embrace it.  If you would like to be officially converted into the Jewish religion, please contact us via e-mail at   jewish@melchizedek.com   If you desire Biblical salvation, you should seriously consider officially becoming Jewish, and begin learning the Jewish teachings and practices as taught by Jesus.

ON THE CATHOLIC CHURCH

We believe that this Church although having its roots in early Christianity, lost its direction upon being institutionalized by the Roman government.

ON MOTHER TERESA

Her life's work was a constant reminder of God's love for mankind. Her example is proof that the true spirit of Christianity can spring from any church.

ON ORTHODOXY

We have discerned the devotion of the orthodox religions, and encourage orthodox leaders to continue vigorously leading their flocks to think and act righteously.

ON THE MUSLIM RELIGIONS

By bringing his brand of monotheism to polytheistic people, was Mohammed submitting to the will of God? He was attempting to bring Christianity back closer to its origin. Perhaps we could say that he was one of the first Protestants.

ON THE PROTESTANT CHURCHES

We believe that these churches being a protest to the institutionalization by Rome have helped to keep Christianity out of the grave. There has always been a "remnant" of true Christians of all denominations throughout the centuries that should not be associated with the crimes committed in the name of God by so-called Catholics and Protestants.

ON CULTS

Every religious organization contains some element of cult activity. We discourage people from labeling any group as a cult, since that word has been so widely misused. We encourage those who condemn other religions to spend more time emphasizing the aspects on which all religions agree, but wait on the "second coming" for the answers to the more difficult theological questions.

ON JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES

We admire their countless, zealous sheep eager to behold the earth full of His glory.

ON THE SEVENTH DAY ADVENTISTS

We admire their desire to do God's will in observing the Sabbath and their zeal for healthy dietary practices. The US government's response to their "Branch Davidian" spin-off is a strong sign of the times, and a clear conviction that non Melchizedekian governments are incapable of governing with true love and care for the people.

ON THE MORMON CHURCH

We admire their sobriety and charity. We hope that their missionary endeavors will yield fruit as they put more emphasis on the old and new testaments, but less on the works of their founder. It is unfortunate that they consented to the US government's demand that they no longer practice polygamy, since the Bible in no way discourages such marital relationships between one man, unless he is a Bishop, and several consenting women. Jesus' teaching that to look upon another (man's) woman with lust in your heart, is an act of adultery, in no way suggests that a man may not have more than one wife, although he did teach that celibacy is a blessed state.

ON THE FIRST CHURCH OF CHRIST, SCIENTIST

It was not the desire of Mary Baker Eddy to found a new church, but that of her followers. In attempting to institutionalize the Science of Christianity, its potential has been temporarily diminished.

Because those controlling Mary's writings have given themselves the authority to change her original words in various new printings of "Science and Health, with Key to the Scriptures", it would be best to obtain authorized editions published just before her death in 1910.

In exchange for removing any reference to Mary Baker Eddy and her writings from this work, certain individuals have promised to distribute our Bibles by the truckload. Mary Baker Eddy has been so grossly misrepresented by some of her followers, and so completely slandered by her enemies that her true character is virtually unknown, and her writings avoided by the majority.

First, it must be admitted that in the 1800's, the medical profession was then far less scientific. Mary Baker Eddy welcomed the advancement of new technology, and stated in her Prose Works, that if you turn to a doctor for help, be sure that he is a qualified physician.

Mary turned to the Bible for comfort in 1866 as she lay dying after a serious accident. She attributed her miraculous recovery to reading the Bible, and thereafter set out to discover a holy science capable of healing mankind. If mental healing was not instant, she recommended the use of temporary relief when pain was unbearable, and that patients should undergo medical examinations to determine the status of a serious physical condition, having bones set, or surgical operations when necessary.

Her primary work was to restore the healing element to Christianity, which was all but dead at the time of her discovery, although she thought of Christian Science more as a preventative than a curative.

Certainly God has given us the intelligence to discover drugs like penicillin, but there should be concern that perhaps the cure is worse than the curse, because it encourages the one guilty of infidelity to increase his behavior, and venereal diseases to reappear in more alarming forms, such as the AIDS epidemic, killing innocent children. New strains of viruses and diseases such as TB that resist medication and antibiotics should cause us to think more about the long term affects of both legal and illegal drug use.

With the passage of time it becomes clearer that Mary was correct in recommending more reliance on God and less on matter. Her revolutionary teaching that doctors and nurses must include love and a positive attitude toward the patient should be an established fact in the medical arts today. Without a doubt there is a connection between one's mental attitude and his physical health.

In Mary's attempt to denounce the reality of evil, we believe that she was teaching the omnipresent omnipotence of God; teaching us to look forward to the day when good will have conquered evil in the thoughts and deeds of mankind; teaching us not to fear or actualize evil in our daily experience.

ON FINANCIAL HEALTH

The Dominion of Melchizedek is in the process of forming the University of Melchizedek as a distant learning center on the Internet, so that classes may be taught covering this subject. Those who sign up for citizenship in the Dominion will be eligible to receive a DOM passport and a monthly distribution of Dominion Dollars through the Internet.

ON AMBASSADORSHIP

The Dominion is in the process of appointing Ambassadors-at-large to every community on earth. If you feel called to this position, we invite you to open a Legation in our name at your home or office only after submitting details of your life's record and qualifications for such a post. We issue a handsome passport with Solomon's Seal in gold and silver on the front cover. The New Testament teaches that one is to be an ambassador of the Messiah.

HISTORICAL BACKGROUNDS AND FACTS

Overview

The Dominion of Melchizedek (mal-khay-tzed-ek) is a recognized ecclesiastical and constitutional sovereignty inspired by the principles of the Melchizedek Bible. As a rapidly expanding, post-modern state, the Dominion's activities are governmental, spiritual, political, educational and humanitarian. References are made to Melchizedek's eternal sovereignty throughout Hebrew and Christian Holy Writ. All monotheistic religions spring from the blessing Old Testament Abraham received from Melchizedek, the righteous king of peace and history's first monotheistic teacher of the Most High God. Due to the fact that information about Melchizedek was almost exclusively found on the Internet, the Dominion was declared by NBC News to be the first nation in cyberspace.  Resulting from acquisitions of islands throughout the 1990's, tax-free, minimal banking legislation and maximum banking secrecy laws,  Melchizedek is fast becoming known as the Switzerland of the Pacific. DOM has also been referred to as the "Sovereign Order of Melchizedek", (SOOM), the "Kingdom of Melchizedek" (KOM), and the "Kingdom of Salem" (KOS). 

Government The Government of the Dominion of Melchizedek (also sometimes spelled, Melchizedech or Melchizedec) consists of three branches, not unlike the structures of the United States of America or that of the United Kingdom.

• The Executive Branch is made up of the senior officers of the Dominion, namely the President, Vice President, Cabinet members, Ambassadors, and certain others.
• The Legislative Branch is comprised of the House of Elders which is the governing body of the Dominion, similar to parliament in the United Kingdom. Its members are more commonly known as "Elders".
• The Judiciary Branch consists of a senior court known as the Supreme Court. Its functions, with certain exceptions, are not to try cases of law, but are to review and to consider appeals of cases previously tried in a competent court of law.

These branches of the Melchizedek government have established satellite communications to be used in Melchizedek's Pacific Territories which are known as Karitane, Malpelo, Clipperton and Taongi Islands.

Language

The official languages of the Dominion are English, Hebrew, Rotuman, Arabic and Ruthenian. All governmental filings are required to be made in English, Hebrew, Rotuman, Arabic or Ruthenian, accompanied by English translation.

Geography, History and Population

The original capital of Melchizedek was Salem (see Genesis 14:18 & Hebrews 7) now called Jerusalem, an ancient city in the Middle East considered to be international territory, "The City of the Great King". The Dominion has reasserted the right to govern its territory of antiquity and homeland, hoping to restore tranquillity to the "City of Peace".   Melchizedek has also located a few possible building sites to erect the "Third Temple" outside of the "Dome of the Rock" as part of a peace plan and for purpose of fulfilling certain prophetic obligations.

On November 26th 1994, the Dominion of Melchizedek acquired sovereign rights from the obscure, unrecognized Kingdom of Polynesia (KOP), over Karitane Island.

Since 1990, DOM claims the previously unclaimed 90-150 degrees West Antarctica (AQ), (approximately 1% of earth's land mass) yet its equally historic claims to the uninhabited islands of Malpelo and Clipperton are disputed by Colombia, which claims Malpelo, and France, which lists Clipperton as a dependency.

On March 20, 1994, a treaty was reached between a representative of the Ruthenian people and The Dominion of Melchizedek wherein the two nationalities spiritually united. There are approximately 1,000,000 Ruthenians occupying the Carpathian and Subcarpathian mountain ranges of Europe. One of the intentions of said treaty is to assist the Ruthenians into some form of independence so that their occupied territory will become an autonomous region of the Dominion of Melchizedek to be government by Ruthenians. Other Ruthenian leaders have yet to endorse the treaty of March 20, 1994.

In accordance with teachings of the Bible, First Chronicles (Chapter 21), the Melchizedek leadership has refrained from conducting a census of its people; therefore, the actual number of Melchizedekians living on earth is not available.

For a list of the Melchizedekian government officials, see the Organizational Structure.

Legislation

The Dominion is regulated by a formal Declaration of Sovereignty and Constitution. Specific legislation has been drawn and enacted by the House of Elders for the purpose of regulating commercial enterprise and ensuring the rights of the people of the Dominion. (See the Legislation page for more details.)

Diplomatic Recognition

On April 28th 1997 DOM and the Kingdom of EnenKio Atoll opened official and formal diplomatic relations.  Written defacto recognition has been obtained by the Dominion of Melchizedek from both first and third world governments; and dejure recognition was extended to Melchizedek by the UN member nation, the Central African Republic, on 3 June 1993.  Dozens of countries have accepted Melchizedekians traveling into those countries bearing DOM passports.  Two southeast Asian countries have issued letters stating that DOM citizens are free to enter those countries without first obtaining visas.    Yet one, Singapore, has since stated that it no longer recognizes the Dominion of Melchizedek.  Other countries have written letters stating that DOM citizens may apply for a visa.   Melchizedek acceded to certain international treaties, including the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, Consular Relations, and The Statute of the Permanent Court of International Justice, Road Traffic, and the Permanent Court of Arbitration, the text of which is available to be viewed at http://melchizedek.com/legal.htm as exhibit within a 43 page legal opinion written by the former Governor of the Dominion Bar Association.  Between January 14-16 of 1998 the Dominion of Melchizedech was approved and recommended at the 32^nd General Assembly and 62^nd Council Meeting in Taipei of the Asian-Pacific Parliamentarians' Union by 9 Pacific island nations and two Asian countries for observer status in said Union.

Commercial Aspects

The Dominion of Melchizedek has adopted legislation which is designed to promote the development of commercial enterprise, inclusive of Banking, Insurance, trust and securities brokerage services, and a host of other businesses. (See Corporation Laws)

Governmental Independence

The Dominion is not interested in foreign aid or assistance which would require that certain concessions be granted prior to receiving the aid or other assistance. The Dominion will not and cannot make those types of concessions, because it would violate the Constitution and principles of the Dominion of Melchizedek.

Human Rights Platform

The Dominion of Melchizedek is also a transnational nation state, established to unite the political representatives, the intellectuals, the professionals, those in business, labor and agriculture, the oppressed and all freedom-aspiring men and women who share the planet Earth.

Not bound by historic traditions or cultural heritage, the Dominion of Melchizedek supports the development of shared values common to all men and women to express the needs, wants and aspiration of the third millennium. The Dominion also supports new concepts relating to international organizations and cooperatives -- designed to recognize, provide and promote, with international recognition, the horizontal integration of interest groups, institutions and entities in the various countries of the planet.  Finally, the Dominion of Melchizedek supports such new forms of international organization and cooperation as a step toward an internationally united planet. 
 

Other relevant sites to visit:

Watch The New DOM-TV

Study The Melchizedek Bible

View Home Page in the Spanish Language

Learn at the Dominion of Melchizedek University

Submit your case to the DOM Court of Arbitration

Join the Dominion of Melchizedek Bar Association

Read the Dominion of Melchizedek Press Releases

Visit the Dominion of Melchizedek World Wide Stock Exchange

Become a Citizen of DOM;   Apply for Passport, ID Card and Driver's Permit

Form a corporation under the incorporation laws of the Dominion of Melchizedek

Inquiries & Information

Government Communications:

Government of Melchizedek
Satellite phone: 00-872-683137397 Fax: 00-872-683137398
Mail routing: Embassy of Melchizedek
PO Box 99, Yarralumla, ACT 2600, Australia

Dominion of Melchizedek Embassy-at-Large, 585 Box Canyon Road, Canoga Park, Ca., 91304 (USA)  Tel: 1-818-703-6236   Fax: 1-818-887-3217 (appointment required before visit)  ambassador@worldspy.net

Embassy of Melchizedek 
Telephone 00 1-202-508-3692 (on forwarding) 
Fax 00 1-202-637-0145 (on forwarding) 
Telex 292388 DOMBNK UR       E-mail: embassy@melchizedek.com

Melchizedek Honorary Consulate for Brazil,                                                                                                                         Av. Nove de Julho, 3133, Jardim Paulista, CEP 01407-000, São Paulo, SP, BRAZIL 
Telephone:  +55-11-887-0141 fax number: +55-11-884-5740 
Visit the Brazilian Honorary Consulate of DOM

Legation of Melchizedek, José de Anchorena 015 departamento 1302, San Isidro, Lima 27, Perú  Teléfono: 51(1)264-4588  Fax: 51(1)264-1406  E-mail:  concret@ibm.net

Dominion of Melchizedek Trade Centre (DOM Asia Liaison Office) 
Paya Lebar P.O. Box No. 0096 
Singapore, 915424, Republic of Singapore 
Phone:  65 280 7777 Fax: 65 286 7474 
E-mail: cscspore@pacific.net.sg

Legation of Melchizedek, Hungary 
Telephone/fax: 00 362 046 3129

Legation of Melchizedek, 17 Ayodeji Otegbola Street, Gbagada Phase II, P.O. Box 8859 Marina, Lagos, Nigeria,  Telephone/fax 00 234 1 82 42 40 
 
 

Part Two
 
 
 
 
 

Brief Discussion of Certain Legal Issues.

This portion of the Letter of Opinion is devoted to resolving whether the Dominion of Melchizedek is an ecclesiastical sovereignty when recognized international legal principles are applied to the question. No attempt has been made to exhaustively cover this subject. As time proceeds this portion of the Letter of Opinion will be supplemented and amended so as to provide a more comprehensive treatment of the subject matter. Please be patient.

The 1933 Montevido convention on the Rights and duties of States in Article I relates:

"The State as a person of international law should possess the following qualifications:

1. a permanent population,
2. a defined territory
3. a government; and
4. a capacity to enter into relations with other States."

Defined Territory

"The control of territory is the essence of a state." [Akehurst, supra p. 76] Most legal scholars on this issue recognize as a watershed case the Island of Las Palmas case [RIAA II 829, at 839 (1928), See also P.C. Jessup, The Palmas Island Arbitration, AJIL 22 (1928), 735-752; R. Lagoni, Palmas Island Arbitration EPIL 2 (1981, 223-224; Harris CMIL, 173-183.]

During the litigation of this case, Judge Huber noted the following on the concept of territorial sovereignty:

Population.

The requirement of population is tied to that of territory. Contrary to popular myth, the size of the population need not be significant. In the case of Somalia for example, large numbers of uncounted [i.e. no census] nomads is not a bar to statehood. [See, D. Orlow, Of Nations Small: The Small State in International Law, Temple ICJL 9 (1995), 115-140; J. Crawford, Islands as Sovereign Nations, ICLQ 38 (1989), 277 et seq.]

Ecclesiastical sovereign states such as the Dominion of Melchizedek are in a category peculiar to themselves. By definition, secular rules of nations adopted by custom in international law are not always strictly applicable to those states which are ecclesiastical in nature. Much the same way a benefice is defined by the Vatican in the case of a diocese, the Dominion of Melchizedek's spiritual territory and citizens have defined themselves.

Government

The effective control by a government over a territory and population is the third core element, and one which is perhaps easiest to handle for purposes of the Letter of Opinion. Clearly the "Declaration of Sovereignty", "Constitution", "Banking Act of 1991", "Insurance Act of 1991" and "Companies Act of 1991" reproduced at the Dominion of Melchizedek's website [www.melchizedek.com] all as amended and supplemented demonstrate a stable and peaceful political organization founded upon Biblical principles exists unchallenged.

The capacity to enter into relations with other states, being the last criterion in the Montevido Convention and also found in the Restatement (Third) of the American Law Institute is equally satisfied by the history of the Dominion provided in Part One of this Letter of Opinion.

In addition to the treaties described in the History of the Dominion of Melchizedek in Part One above, the Dominion recently entered into the following accession agreements within two very significant Conventions. In the beginning of October, the dominion acceded to the Convention on Road Traffic, with Annexes and Protocol

Done at Geneva September 19, 1949; entered into force

March 26, 1952. 3 UST 3008; TIAS 2487; 125 UNTS

The full text of a copy of that letter of Accession is set out in the box below: 

_____________________________________________

The Right Honourable Kofi Annan

Secretary General

United Nations General Assembly

New York [10017], New York 

Re: Notice of Accession to:

Convention on Road Traffic, with Annexes and Protocol

Done at Geneva September 19, 1949; entered into force

March 26, 1952. 3 UST 3008; TIAS 2487; 125 UNTS 22. 

Dear Secretary General:

Notice of Accession

Whereas, the Undersealed President, under Section 2.0 et seq. of the Constitution of the Dominion of Melchizedek sealed July 18, 1991, has full, Sovereign and vested power and authority to enter into treaties by signature, ratification, adherence and accession thereby binding the Dominion of Melchizedek and its Citizens;

Now Be It Hereby known, that the Dominion of Melchizedek, an Ecclesiastical Sovereignty, with Sovereign rights over Karitane island of the Polynesian South Pacific group [close to 25 degrees south latitude and 159 degrees west longitude] hereby accedes as a "State" to the:

Correspondence concerning this Notice of Accession may be directed to the Office of the President, Dominion of Melchizedek, at:

Yours Respectfully,

Office of the President

Dominion of Melchizedek Embassy 

By: ________/s/_________________[L.S.]

Ms. Pearlasia

President

[Sovereign Seal of Office of President]

_____________________________________________

In addition, the Dominion of Melchizedek also acceded to the following Hague Conventions for the reasons stated in the full text of the letter in the box below:

_____________________________________________ 

The Right Honourable Kofi Annan

Secretary General

United Nations General Assembly

New York [10017], New York 

The Right Honourable P.J.H. Jonkman

Secretary General and International Bureau

Peace Palace

Carneigieplein 2

2517 KJ The Hague 

Re: Notice of Accession to:

Hague Convention I for Pacific Settlement of International

Disputes (1898) [UKTS 9 (1901) Cd. 798]; and

Hague Convention for Pacific Settlement of International

Disputes (1907) [UKTS 6 (1971 Cmnd. 4575]. 

Dear Secretaries General:

Notice of Accession

Whereas, the Undersealed President, under Section 2.0 et seq. of the Constitution of the Dominion of Melchizedek sealed July 18, 1991, has full, Sovereign and vested power and authority to enter into treaties by signature, ratification, adherence and accession thereby binding the Dominion of Melchizedek and its Citizens;

Now Be It Hereby known, that the Dominion of Melchizedek, an Ecclesiastical Sovereignty, with Sovereign rights over Karitane island of the Polynesian South Pacific group [close to 25 degrees south latitude and 159 degrees west longitude] hereby accedes as a "State" to the:

said Conventions to apply to, inter alia, Karitane island of the Polynesian South Pacific group [close to 25 degrees south latitude and 159 degrees west longitude]. It is intended by this Notice that the Dominion of Melchizedek be and hereby is an acceding "party" to the Convention, as the term "party" is signified in the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties U.N. DOC. A/CONF. 39/27, (1969), 63 A.J.I.L. 875 (1969), 8 I.L.M. 679 (1969) at Article 2, Paragraphs 1(a), (b) and (g), and Article 11. Furthermore, it is intended for purposes of this Notice that the Dominion of Melchizedek be treated as a Sovereign Ecclesiastical "State" with full "political existence of the state independent of recognition by other states" as expressly stated in the Convention on Rights and Duties of States, 49 Stat. 3097, T.S. 881, 165 L.N.T.S. 19, 3 Bevans 145, done at Montevideo, Uruguay on December 26, 1934 which states at Articles 2 and 3:

Correspondence concerning this Notice of Accession may be directed to the Office of the President, Dominion of Melchizedek, at:

Yours Respectfully,

Office of the President

Dominion of Melchizedek Embassy 

By: ____________________________[L.S.]

Ms. Pearlasia

President

[Sovereign Seal of Office of President]

_____________________________________________

Thus, by any reasoned definition, it can hardly be argued the Dominion of Melchizedek lacks any capacity to enter into relations with other States. The portion of the Montevido Convention set out in each of the letters [i.e. Article 3] indicates that all States recognize the "political existence of a State" is completely independent of any recognition issue.

Recognition versus Non-Recognition.

Each reader of this Letter of Opinion will no doubt confront the issue of "recognition" or "lack of recognition" during any investigation of the Dominion of Melchizedek. Some experts will state recognition is unnecessary. Some will argue recognition [whether de jure or defacto] has already occurred, and others will argue the United States and United Kingdom no longer recognize any nation officially. The question is, what is the truth concerning the international community's views toward this contentious issue?

Based upon the foregoing it is beyond cavil that the Dominion of Melchizedek is a foreign state within the spirit and intention of international law. Whether the United States, United Kingdom or other superpowers decide to enter into diplomatic relations with the Dominion is of no significance concerning the issue of political existence. While such a relationship of peaceful diplomatic relations with the United States and the United Kingdom, among other superpowers is strongly hoped for, such an eventuality is squarely in the hands of the Most High God.

Biblical Perspective on Recognition.

One final note must be discussed concerning a Biblical perspective on the issue of recognition. What has been discussed above has been analyzed from primarily a secular angle. A critical question that has not been discussed thus far is: "How many nation states have recognized the historical truth of the Holy Bible including the creation of the Dominion of Melchizedek as an everlasting Dominion, Kingdom and Priesthood? This is perhaps the best bell weather concerning the recognition of the Dominion of Melchizedek. Political reasons which are self-serving will always abound when the issue of recognition of an ecclesiastical sovereign dominion and kingdom are discussed. Exhibit "A" found immediately below sets out the agreement of States concerning the rights of inhabitants of the world to associate together based upon strongly held religious beliefs. No international agreement is more pertinent to the Dominion of Melchizedek than the "Declaration on the Elimination of all Forms of Intolerance and of Discrimination based on Religion or Belief, ensealed in 1982 by many nation states."

Part Three and Conclusion

As was stated at the beginning of this Letter of Opinion, the author reserves the right to supplement and amend this Letter of Opinion when deemed necessary. No reader should rely upon anything contained in this Letter of Opinion, it being a better course of action for all interested readers to retain appropriate independent legal counsel to advise them of each issue of significance.

May the Peace with Passeth All Understanding

Bless Each of You and Your Families

By: The Dominion of Melchizedek Embassy 

_____________________________[L.S.]

By: Geoffrey Craig benRichard barAbba, JD

Former Governor of the DOM Bar Association and Former Honorary Counsel 
 
 
 

Exhibit "A" 

DECLARATION ON THE ELIMINATION OF ALL FORMS

OF INTOLERANCE AND OF DISCRIMINATION

BASED ON RELIGION OR BELIEF, 

G.A.RES. 55 (XXXVI 1981), 21 I.L.M. 205 (1982). *
 
 
 
 
 

The General Assembly, 

Considering that one of the basic principles of the Charter of the United Nations is that of the dignity and equality inherent in all human beings, and that all Member States have pledged themselves to take joint and separate action in co-operation with the Organization to promote and encourage universal respect for and observance of human rights and fundamental freedoms for all, without distinction as to race, sex, language or religion,

Considering that the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenants on Human Rights proclaim the principles of nondiscrimination and equality before the law and the right to freedom of thought, conscience, religion and belief,

Considering that the disregard and infringement of human rights and fundamental freedoms, in particular of the right to freedom of thought, conscience, religion or whatever belief, have brought, directly or indirectly, wars and great suffering to mankind, especially where they serve as a means of foreign interference in the internal affairs of other States and amount to kindling hatred between peoples and nations,

Considering that religion or belief, for anyone who professes either, is one of the fundamental elements in his conception of life and that freedom of religion or belief should be fully respected and guaranteed,

Considering that it is essential to promote understanding, tolerance and respect in matters relating to freedom of religion and belief and to ensure that the use of religion or belief for ends inconsistent with the Charter of the United Nations, other relevant instruments of the United Nations and the purposes and principles of the present Declaration is inadmissible,

____________________________

* Adopted by the United Nations General Assembly without a vote on November 25, 1981.

Convinced that freedom of religion and belief should also contribute to the attainment of the goals of world peace, social justice and friendship among peoples and to the elimination of ideologies or practices of colonialism and racial discrimination,

Noting with satisfaction the adoption of several, and the coming into force of some, convention, under the aegis of the United Nations and of the specialized agencies, for the elimination of various forms of discrimination,

Concerned by manifestations of intolerance and by the, existence of discrimination in matters of religion or belief still in evidence in some, areas of the world,

Resolved to adopt all necessary measures for the speedy